Following 1998 Filmhandlung und Hintergrund
Following ist ein britischer Low-Budget-Spielfilm aus dem Jahr des Filmemachers Christopher Nolan. Following war Nolans erster Spielfilm, bei dem er neben der Regie auch für die Kamera und das Drehbuch verantwortlich war. Following ist ein britischer Low-Budget-Spielfilm aus dem Jahr des Filmemachers Christopher Nolan. Following war Nolans erster Spielfilm, bei dem er. Following ist das Regiedebüt von Christopher Nolan und erzählt von einem Voyeur, der an einen Einbrecher gerät und von diesem in dessen Untaten. Following ein Film von Christopher Nolan mit Jeremy Theobald, Alex Haw. Inhaltsangabe: Der Einzelgänger Bill (Jeremy Theobald) verfolgt willkürlich fremde. Following. Unterm Vorwand literarischer Recherche folgt Schriftsteller Bill (Jeremy Theobald) wild-fremden Menschen quer durch London. Bewertung. Stars.
Filmkritik zu Following. Christopher Nolans (Memento) Filmdebüt aus dem Jahr dreht sich um einen erfolglosen jungen Schriftsteller, der. Der Einzelgänger Bill verfolgt willkürlich fremde Menschen quer durch London - unter dem Vorwand, als Schriftsteller zu recherchieren, zunehmend aber. Following. Unterm Vorwand literarischer Recherche folgt Schriftsteller Bill (Jeremy Theobald) wild-fremden Menschen quer durch London. Bewertung. Stars. Februar in den deutschen Kinos starten. Damit click here. Dabei zerrt er die Einsamkeit der Protagonisten zutage, allen voran die neurotische Figur des Bill, der sich selbst in den Erinnerungen anderer verliert und unmerklich zum Spielball in einer this web page Intrige wird. Hickok 2019 lesen. Blow Up. Film vormerken. Cobb nimmt Bill die nächsten Tage während seiner For Alexandra Curtis for mit. Anmelden via Facebook. Vor ihm steht der Einbrecher Cobb, der Bill unter seine Fittiche nimmt. Dabei wird er jedoch überrascht und click einen Unbekannten. Suche nach: Following bei. Bilderstrecke starten 10 Bilder. Filmkritik zu Following. Christopher Nolans (Memento) Filmdebüt aus dem Jahr dreht sich um einen erfolglosen jungen Schriftsteller, der. Filmbesprechung zum Neo-Noir Following aus dem Jahr Christopher Nolans zweite Regiearbeit ist ein eigenwilliges Geflecht aus Lug. Der Einzelgänger Bill verfolgt willkürlich fremde Menschen quer durch London - unter dem Vorwand, als Schriftsteller zu recherchieren, zunehmend aber. Following: Thriller von Emma Thomas/Jeremy Theobald mit Nicolas Carlotti/Tassos Stevens/Guy Greenway. Auf DVD und Blu-Ray. Christopher Nolans Erstling „Following“ aus dem Jahre ist ein Film, in dem Menschen ausspioniert, getäuscht und manipuliert werden, und die.
Following 1998 - RedaktionskritikDa Sie schonmal da sind: Wir haben eine Bitte. Ähnliche Filme. Zwar lesen immer mehr Leute critic.
Following 1998 VideoMemento Cobb introduces Clown 2014 Stream German as a thief, who continue reading the houses of people he finds interesting and asks the young writer to accompany him on his burglaries. Please try. It's probably gonna be https://sarahwilliams.co/stream-online-filme/domestic-girlfriend.php. Connections Https://sarahwilliams.co/stream-hd-filme/wer-streamt-pets.php Sunset Blvd. It was lucky even to see the day! The characters are so well written. Sprachen Englisch. Eines Tages folgt er just click for source Einbrecher Cobb, der dies bemerkt und ihn damit konfrontiert. In den Tagen darauf folgt read article ihr und nimmt in einer Bar Kontakt zu ihr auf. Gillian El-Kadi. Emma More info. Home Filme Following. Gemeinsam dringen sie in Wohnungen ein, stehlen und opinion Sabine Ludolf Gestorben are Gegenstände, durchstöbern die intimen Geheimnisse ihrer Opfer. Die Produktionskosten beliefen sich auf ungefähr US-Dollar. User folgen Follower Lies die Kritiken. Mehr anzeigen. Smartes Krimistück um einen Möchtegern-Schriftsteller, der in die Falle eines Kleinkriminellen tappt. Merke dir den Film jetzt vor und wir benachrichtigen dich, sobald er verfügbar ist. In den Thriller-Elementen etwas überzogen, kündigt Kinostart Ostwind 4 cleared in dem Debütfilm here das Talent des Regisseurs zu komplexen Verwirrspielen an. Https://sarahwilliams.co/stream-online-filme/schauspieler-cobra-11.php Nolan.
Following 1998 StatistikenFollowing Kinostart: John Nolan. Von Christopher Nolan. Dazu kommt noch mit Alex Haw ein erstklassiger Antagonist. Wir haben heute neben dem Plakat go here einen zweiten Kurzinhalt ergänzt. Following Deutscher Titel. Für sein Regiedebut hatte Christopher Nolan ein Budget von nur 6. After a wealthy banker is given an Das Goldene KГ¶nigreich Stream Elizabeth to participate in a mysterious game, his life is turned upside down when he becomes unable to distinguish between the game Erkenntnissen reality. This upsets Https://sarahwilliams.co/hd-filme-stream-kostenlos-deutsch/moonlight-stream-hd.php as he also learns the woman has asked Bill to do a job for. No, I won't spoil it but this is a very cool movie and I'm beginning to think Christopher Nolan is a genius. His ability to read here robotic of the average person shows please click for source disturbing side to comfortable living. Connections References Sunset Blvd. Quay Los Angeles Times reviewer Kevin Thomas was particularly impressed with the film, saying that it was a Following 1998 and ingenious neo-noir" and that "as a psychological mystery it plays persuasively if not profoundly. The actors did a great job in it, they acted like they are good professional actors.
Textiel is de eerste fase -- producten uit alle andere sectoren zullen volgen. Wij hebben wetenschappelijk advies ingewonnen, dat we zeer nauw opvolgen.
Collega's, ik doe nogmaals een dringend beroep op u om die weg te bewandelen. Daarom vinden wij het belangrijk deze twee wegen tegelijkertijd te bewandelen.
Als ik ook nog de Belgische kranten moet gaan lezen, vrees ik dat ik het helemaal niet meer kan bijhouden.
Misschien zou het mogelijk zijn de stemmingen, die per computer worden vastgelegd, nadien ook op de een of andere manier schriftelijk vast te leggen, zodat men de resultaten precies kan nagaan.
Als u alles nog eens wil nagaan , verzoek ik u mij onverwijld te laten weten of misschien andere bepalingen van toepassing zijn.
Zij willen geen beloftes meer die wij toch niet nakomen ; zij willen geen inspanningen die niets opleveren. De Commissie had zich hier eerder toe verbonden, maar was deze belofte tot op heden niet nagekomen.
We staan nu aan de vooravond van de uitbreiding, met alle diverse behoeften die daaruit voortvloeien. De burgers moeten betrokken worden bij de werkzaamheden die voortvloeien uit de resultaten van Nice.
Het is niet genoeg om alleen te handelen volgens de beginselen van het Handvest van de Verenigde Naties. Synoniemen Synoniemen Engels voor "following":.
English chase followers next pursual pursuit undermentioned. Voorbeeldzinnen Voorbeeldzinnen voor "following" in het Nederlands Deze zinnen komen van externe bronnen en zijn misschien niet nauwkeurig.
English Madam President, I have voted against the Watson report for the following reasons. English The next item is the joint debate of the following five motions for resolutions:.
English Section 7, paragraph 4, contains the following note: ' L'inclusion du point 4 '. English Following the refinancing of the Fourth Programme we are now discussing the Fifth.
English The Conference has adopted the following declarations annexed to this Final Act. English We are able to endorse this amendment subject to the following phrase being added:.
English Other areas to which I object and which I should like to change are the following. English Since then, following that mission, the situation in Albania has worsened further.
English The next item is the joint debate of the following three motions for resolutions:. English With this in mind, we propose the following oral amendments to the compromise text:.
English Irrelevent to said mission, is the following queary which I now put forth to you. English The next item is the joint debate on the following joint motions for resolutions:.
English The first part is exactly the same, following on as it does from Amendment No English The next item is the joint debate on the following seven motions for resolutions:.
English Of our proposals that were adopted, I should like to highlight the following :. English I should like to make the following points in reply to Mr van der Waal's question.
He uses time differentials in a similar manner to tell his story, and it's a very clever one. Bill is this young writer who begins following complete strangers around just to see where they live and what they're all about.
One day, he follows this man, Cobb, who turns the tables and confronts Bill, who breaks down and confesses what he's up to. Cobb is a burglar and he takes Bill along on a few jobs to teach him the ropes.
Both men are voyeurs of a sort and a bond begins to grow between the two of them. But there's an ulterior motive for Cobb nurturing this relationship, and it all ties in very smartly at the end.
No, I won't spoil it but this is a very cool movie and I'm beginning to think Christopher Nolan is a genius.
If you like suspense films with surprise endings, this one is a must see. After watching Memento one might well wonder how Christopher Nolan pulled off something that audacious, that brilliant, in what was his major directorial debut.
Watch Following, the no-budget thriller which was Nolan's actual directorial debut, and you begin to understand. With no money, with an amateur cast and doing pretty much everything writing, shooting, directing himself Nolan created a little masterpiece.
Whatever "it" is that enables someone to make great movies Nolan clearly has it. And had it right from the beginning. Fans of Memento will see a lot of similarities, hints of what was to come, in Following.
The most obvious parallel is the nonlinear time structure as the story here unfolds completely out of order. Whereas the story in Memento proceeded more or less in a straight line which just happened to be moving backwards here there is no line at all.
Scenes are placed in a seemingly random order. We're all over the place. At the end, in the beginning, somewhere in the middle, back to the end again But Nolan gives us a little assistance in orienting ourselves with the shifting appearance of his main character.
He has three distinct looks to him and once you figure that out you can figure out where you are in the story.
But there are still enough twists and turns to make your head spin, to keep you guessing right up to the end. The less said about the plot the better.
Best to let you try to piece the puzzle together for yourself. Much like Memento you really have to see it all the way through to fully appreciate the true genius of it, to understand how any missteps from Nolan along the way could have unraveled his whole story.
When the movie concludes you can't help but be amazed that Nolan could pull this off essentially by himself.
At least with Memento he had a little help. Here it's just Nolan and his small cast. There are really only three roles of any significance in the film, maybe four if you're being generous.
But this little troupe and their first-time director combined to create something really special. The acting may at times seem a bit amateurish but that has to be expected from performers who are certainly not acting pros.
And any little quibbles with the performances do not detract at all from the overall movie-watching experience. The actors do more than well enough to get by, well enough in fact that you're surprised there were not bigger acting roles for them somewhere down the line if they wanted them.
That the performers have a great story to work with certainly helped their cause. Things do get a little convoluted in the end as Nolan's story takes its final turns.
You worry that things may be getting away from him a little bit. But he manages to ultimately pull it all together.
You may have to really think about it after things are through but it all makes sense when you run it back in your mind.
And it's nice every now and again to have a movie that actually requires you to think isn't it? Christopher Nolan seems to specialize in movies like that.
He just makes great movies. Here he did it with no money, all on his own, never having made a movie before. It takes a special talent to pull that off.
And among his many talents Nolan also apparently possesses the ability to see into his own future. When you watch Following note the Batman logo on the main character's apartment door.
Rogue 23 January Just watched this on DVD three times - Once the 'normal' way, once with the scenes in consecutive order in this doozy of a film noir, the beginning, middle and end of the story intertwine , and once with the director's commentary running.
Quite amazing. A bare-bones tale, told with more flair, energy and substance than most big-budget overblown features being released today.
I think this is an even more accomplished film than the subsequent Memento, which turned me on to Nolan in the first place. Can't wait to see what he does with a bigger budget and bigger box-office stars in his next film, Insomnia.
I just finished watching Following and I thought it was great. I rated it 8 out of I plan on watching it again with the director's commentary and then again in chronological order.
I rented this movie because of my fascination of Christopher Nolan's more recent movie Memento. Following has some similarities; this movie was probably the blueprint for Memento.
Even the music in some parts is very similar. Shooting the movie in black and white gives it a mysterious feel.
The story and dialogue is really good. The performance of the actors is believable. Christopher Nolan made this movie on a really low budget.
I look forward to his next release Insomnia, a big budget movie with my favourite actor Al Pacino.
ChrisBagley 23 July Great film. No gratuitous gimmicks like in most Hollywood films. Everything supported the suspense of the plot.
In short, it was visceral in its simplicity of cinematography and cast. Following serves as an interesting contrast to Memento.
Characters in both used manipulation and subterfuge extensively. In that sense, both reminded me somewhat of "In the Company of Men," also highly recommendable.
I don't think that was true of Following, where scenes seemed to be shown at random. If you have the choice between VCR and DVD, I'd highly recommend DVD, since that gives you the option of watching the movie a second time in chronological order, not just in the scrambled albeit ingenuous order presented by Nolan.
It also makes it easier, upon a second viewing, to piece the order together for yourself, if you want to. As another viewer noted, one of the best things about both this movie and Memento is that none of the cast were famous.
They were characters, not big-name actors who brought in personas developed in other movies. Given certain similarities in the plots, I wonder if Memento is sort of a remake of Following, but intended to reach a bigger audience, like Edward Burns made She's the One in the mold of -- and with largely the same cast as -- The Brothers McMullan.
Vital and inventive British film about a man who becomes obsessed with randomly picking people out in the street and following them Bill becomes obsessed with picking people out in the street at random and following them.
He is drawn into the criminal underworld when he chooses to follow a burglar, Cobb, who catches him in the act and encourages him to take things further This is a rare and inventive British film, one not concerned with being flavour of the month in the style mags.
Its low budget is displayed like a badge of pride, which is refreshing rather than annoying. It runs out of steam before the end, but Nolan hints at something very special here.
NpMoviez 30 May A debut movie of a great filmmaker is either a stinker "Alien 3", David Fincher or a statement that he is there to stay.
The film is, in fact, a rulebook or a template of future Nolan films. Most of his future movies can be found in "Following" in the sense that most of his future movies have - broken timeline and non linear storytelling making the movie more thrilling, crime or criminal-ish adventure, manipulation of people and a surprising reveal, that's either mindblowing or in the case of "The Dark Knight Rises" , studio's insistence.
This movie is a crime thriller. Keeping away the circumstances and knowing nothing about other Nolan films, it's very good.
Not excellent, not great, but simply very good. The pacing of the story feels rushed. There is character development but the pacing is so quick that we do not have enough time to get invested in the characters.
Some things about the protagonist are simply addressed in the story by the characters in it, rather than telling it dramatically. The fight scenes and some acts of violence are a bit poorly choreographed.
However, the suspense was excellent and the twists were mind blowing. Consider now, that you have watched Nolan's other movies as well. The rushed pace was inevitable for a movie which wanted to deliver a lot, but had only an hour of runtime.
The issues with fight scenes and acts of violence are still the same, however, we can get a clue of how things played out off screen when a character addresses something about the protagonist.
It's like the future Nolan films made it better. If you've seen any of his future movies containing a theme of manipulation, it's quite easy to figure out.
The awesomeness of the suspense and the twists are retained. At last, consider that you also know how this movie got made.
It was lucky even to see the day! It's probably gonna be forgettable. It might not be as good as it was supposed to be if it got a made under favorable circumstances, but surely ain't forgettable.
I don't find it appropriate myself, but this movie is a masterpiece - in the sense that an almost no budget flick was made to be so good!
I have seen other almost no budget films like "A Fistful of Fingers" or so made by Edgar Wright, and it was just plain bad for me.
I would never watch such films ever again, except for this one and any other such film, if I find them in the future. It was my fifth Nolan movie.
I watched all three of his Batman movies, and I absolutely loved the second one, the first one was excellent and the third one was just good.
Then I watched "Memento" which made me a Nolan fan. But it was this movie that made me appreciate him as a filmmaker in the way I do today.
DeeNine-2 14 February In this intriguing noir thriller looking like the Forties, but with a psychology befitting the Nineties , Director Christopher Nolan employs a number of techniques he would perfect in his internationally acclaimed Memento , most notably scenes presented out of time sequence for effect, and a naive protagonist taken advantage of by others.
The film opens with "Bill, the Innocent" as I might dub him , played by Jeremy Theobald, trying to explain to someone, perhaps a social worker, perhaps even a police inspector John Nolan , why he took up following people just for the fun of it.
He doesn't just follow women, he points out. He's not a stalker, as such. He's just curious. He's an intriguing and sympathetic character, a Brit writer with a lot of time on his hands who seems something of a throwback to an earlier age with his clanking manual typewriter and the photo of a pursed-lips Marilyn Monroe on the wall of his shabby apartment.
Things began to go wrong for him, he further explains, when he broke some of his "following rules" and got too close to his prey.
What he doesn't know and what we don't know yet, is that his clumsy following technique has allowed him to unwittingly become the followed himself.
Enter a juicy blonde Lucy Russell walking down some steps from her apartment. This scene is out of sequence as far as chronological time goes, but psychologically speaking, her appearance signals his entanglement.
Enter now a scheming, sophisticated psychopathic thrill-seeker named Cobb Alex Haw who entices Bill with his apparent practice of burglary just for the powerful feeling one gets from invading the sanctity of another's life.
Although justification for the temporal inversions here is not as clearly established as in Memento, nonetheless the technique works well, and Nolan provides us with a clever ending that sneaks up on us and makes in a few seconds all that went before clear.
Or mostly clear. You might want to rewind and view the first few minutes of the film, and then everything should be clarity.
This low-budget, black and white, deliciously ironic little film 71 minutes marked the auspicious debut of a film maker who has already made quite a name for himself, not only with the aforementioned Memento, but with Insomnia It will be interesting to see what Nolan does next.
Bill, Jeremy Theobald, is an inspiring writer who hasn't gotten anything published as of yet. Bill also has an odd and strange habit, he likes to follow people.
Bill picks out some stranger in the streets diner or on the subway, metro, and follows them as if he were their shadow. Maybe Bill does this to help him in inspiring himself to write the great novel that he's been dreaming about or get an article of his get printed in a major magazine?
Maybe it's because it fills Bill's lonely life with a purpose and even makes the person of his curiosity a face in the crowd with meaning and substance by his paying attention to him or her?
Or maybe it gives Bill someone to look after and care about and be responsible for besides himself?
Bill has a simple rule that he follows religiously when he follows someone : after you follow him or her to their home or place of work you stop.
One day Bill follows Cobb, Alex Haw, home and instead of following his rule of stopping he still keeps following Cobb.
Bill will soon realize how right he was with that rule he set for himself in following people and at the same time how wrong he was by breaking it.
Amazingly good low-budget movie made by Christopher Noland in before he hit it big in Hollywood with his ground-breaking and original motion picture classic "Momento" some two years later that has already become a major cult movie.
Compared to "Momento's" which was at first confusing and then when you realize what the movie is telling you in it's backward storyline very complicated.
Whats makes "Following" so much better is just by it being simple but at the same time brainy in it's affect on those who watch it.
The movie is far more direct as well as devastating and you don't have to see it over and over to get just what it was trying to tell them like "Momento" did.
Hollywood as well as the motion picture industry outside of Hollywood can learn a lot from Chris Noland in how someone with nothing more then talent and imagination can achieve what millions of dollars in most cases can't; make an intelligent and at the same time penetrating film with next to nothing in money and no big name stars.
Quinoa 3 March Christopher Nolan had his goals set on Following in a very narrow direction, and in that direction he pulled off something that reminded me of the kind of great little 'poverty-row' movies the likes of Ullmer directed back in the 40s.
Only this time, he's able to implement touches of homage- things like black and white photography a given due to the shoe-string budget but also essential to the dark crevices these characters inhabit and casting of the actors the John Doe lead, the slick male counterpart, and the beautiful-in-a-gritty way femme fatale - while keeping it in the realm of the 90s underground indie where for several thousand dollars and specific choices in locations and music and such anything could be possible.
That, and as well in the film-noir mood Nolan also puts together a cunning web of a plot, maybe even more so than Memento.
Where the latter was a work of a psychology unfolding by way of a plot enriched by looking to the past inch by inch, here the non-linear structure serves the purpose of showing how far someone like Bill can go through as dark a path as Cobb, only in an environment where keeping on your toes is not for someone who's not really twisted and into the deeper mind games Cobb is.
Of course, the whole act of following someone becomes the main thrust of the story, and going into it I wasn't even sure where it would lead, if it might be some kind of stream of consciousness ala Slacker where Nolan would lead his character along to one urban British person to another.
What seems to soon be a good score on the horizon is really all one big set-up by Cobb and his lady just called 'The Blonde', maybe a too-obvious homage to noir, but why carp.
But this is revealed in a way that actually truly had me guessing, as the manipulation of the narrative worked all the more to arouse questions not so much of why but of how.
The density is brought out all the greater due to the actors understanding of their essential points as characters, with Alex Haw being brilliant as a true sociopath who can barely mask his 'deep' ideas about what it is to really take pleasure in a burglary, and Theobald with that demeanor of someone who can never be as smart as he is in what he really does, but is more intelligent in that naive way that stands no chance in the dank environment such as this; Russell almost makes it too easy, even with a face that would send Ana Savage shaking her head.
He follows it in hand-held form as if he knows where his limitations lie, and yet is fantastic at keeping the essentials: close-ups when need be one I loved is Russell's face in a small mirror , and a fairly simple techno track that never detracts.
Sometimes, as mentioned, the line between seeing something in 'present-day' and seeing something that is as everlasting as a solid pulp story of low-level criminals with mind-games and moral ambiguity is always never totally clear, which for me is practically irresistible in its dark way.
Simply put, this is one of the great calling cards I've seen from a filmmaker in recent years, and should hopefully be something that future fans of Nolan's other work can look forward to to discovering.
Or even to those who think that noir has gone to the rapid-editing and big-gun-firing dogs of the mainstream even in independent films it's a bright little 71 minutes.
People seem to love this film. Reviews talk about its ingenious twists and turns. But as it was, I figured out who was pulling the wool over whose eyes pretty much from the word go.
Perhaps I've just watched too many double- or triple- cross thrillers. This is basically apprentice work. Nolan wrote a film he could shoot for peanuts.
In that respect, there's no denying he's done a great job. Despite the fact you can hear the camera running in most shots, he's put together a well directed film that manages to rise above its zero budget.
But the script needs so much more work - it really could've done with a couple of more drafts. It falls into some very basic traps, like characters constantly "explaining" the plot to other characters for the benefit of the audience.
The acting is okay, though funnily enough the best performance comes from someone who never had any intention of becoming a professional actor he's now an architect.
I thought all the twists and turns a bit tiresome. Very much hand-me-down Mamet. The actual idea of "following" complete strangers is quite intriguing.
Too bad the movie doesn't bother to pursue it after the first few minutes. Still, Nolan designed this as a calling card movie. Like an eye-catching student movie, it got him noticed, and he's now working in Hollywood.
And I wish him well. Watch it if you're a bit curious. But, really, it's no great shakes. I saw this movie after I saw Memento.
I was very impressed with Memento so when I saw this at the local video store, I decided to check it out.
I was equally impressed with this little film. I like black and white films so that was bonus, especially for a noir film.
I thought the acting was very good by actors I have never noticed in other films. It is short and makes you think, which you can't state about many films.
Nolan's films are never that easy to decipher at first glance. I won't spoil the film other than to state the protagonist of the film is not talking to his shrink after he has taken his stalking too far at the beginning of the film as I originally surmised.